Time and again spirited negotiations occur on internet fora pertaining to an study of the status of a number of jyotish parameters, including chara dasha (a signal based cortical period astrofactor) and also karakamsha (that the navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most complex planet in longitude) is set. As characteristically happens, some of the discussants began to branch to other side discussions that had nothing more to do with the first questions or themes along with some became a little resolved and emotional, as also frequently happens on the internet where attention spans of weeks and days have been required so as to get to the underside of matters and where some times an interest is being discussed on several distinct boards and many topics simultaneously on a given board! As too is typical, nothing has been resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about such issues coming up again and again again and directing people to archives . Unfortunately, the ya-hoo forums/fora are those that only limited hunting of previous messages will be possible without losing all one's hair, and the writings are often kept onto another yahoo site therefore this will not help things when everybody wants is to find yourself a quick summary of what the others are using and when possible their reasons for embracing a certain position! This latter brings forth more gall than good advice even though the intention of the individual posing the question might have been very noble and not in any way confrontational. Knowing Jyotish doesn't protect one from harbouring Neurotic characteristics!
Somewhere, along the path with the former pursuit, yet another issue got born and began questioning the use of varga kundalis or even varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the center of jyotish and have already been used by tropical astrologers in the kind of harmonic graphs. This really is some thing which is employed in Jyotish going straight back to almost the very first memories of even the earliest members in the forum who finally confessed to such being the situation. I myself, even though myself perhaps not that senior, have seen horoscopes which were drawn in the century before last where the jyotishi had drawn the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and therefore on and much more importantly had commented on these charts in his hearing. kalyan chart So, at the very least some individuals had been utilizing varga-charts even a couple of hundred decades ago and conceivably perhaps even just before those times.
Somewhere during the conversation, in another of the lists, a number of the associates made available a post in which the writer had expressed thoughts to the contrary, i.e., vargas must not be utilised in a chart format. A discussion ensued which sidestepped the more important and relevant matter of these practical merits of using of navamsha varga like a second chart. A couple of individuals asked for proofs in classics that indicates that early jyotishis urged of varga chakras. The discussants highlighted that ONLY rashi chakra has to be properly used and varga placements should just be useful for discovering the features of planets etc..
Now, people who have studied BPHS might knowthat 16 vargas were characterized by the Sage beginning with rashi ehich is also known as'kshetra' (field or area) etc. One of those associates attracted on each of astrologers' attention that Parashara had clarified very plainly just how to find out bhavas from the rashi graph (ascendant, 10th dwelling and trisection of their arcs, etc. . V of BPHS). This was indeed true and also a positive step forward in the conversation. There were also parallel discussions going on which were rehashing that BPHS was not original and was not even a timeless and written by one or a group of'latter day saints' [my term, not the original poster!] In Jyotish and for that reason cannot be treated as a classic. Apparently, there was some support to this as could be similarly expected if someone should happen to produce a comment that Jyotish was just a derivative of astrology that the army that was included with Alexander brought to India. An issue that has been acknowledged to attract even sedate jyotishis out on the"war-path!"
To those who have been still interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there looked to be two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Just Rashi horoscopes ought to be used. Additional varga kundalis were the product of tainted understanding of the classics - which themselves many concur may not have survived in pure form [although a number of them have mercifully lived in pretty great shape1]. I don't know how much with this iceberg postulate is established data and how much is wishful fiction. According to the purists of the stream of thought, vargas MUST simply be used as measures of quantitative and qualitative strength of planets and because of the consideration of this deities and primal forces people represent although perhaps not at the form of a horoscope and clearly no serious consideration has to be given to aspects and bhava considerations. Just for clarity, they would maintain, for example, that as the second house lord at navamsha is an important index, the fact that it is placed in the 2 nd navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in 2nd dwelling in navamsha chart) is not significant. Or, for example, when Mars is in Aries sign and Libra navamsha, and Saturn is in Gemini sign and Libra navamsha, the two planets aren't related (though they would be depicted as being conjoined in the same navamsha varga in a navamsha chart).
(b) Regardless of whether specifically clarified or not, the other flow of believing maintains that varga kundalis have an important function to play in Jyotish and possibly are of significant usefulness in differentiating primary mandates matters pertaining to the prescription written by sages. In other words, navamsha chart, by way of instance, would hold significant sway within matters of spouse and marriage, while saptamsha chart are of import in the study of children in a particular nativity's reading. These Vargas ought to be analyzed in a graph format.
In fact, the majority of them utilized concepts from both (a) and (b) streams. There appeared to be a few different individuals who totally denied that the veracity of idea flow (b) and also a few were a little taciturn about any of this, perhaps in order to prevent acrimony and becoming ensnared from the controversy. Or there were some other good reasons, known only to them.